It's no secret that for the last 3 decades the so called music critic Jim Derogatis has been the leading person keeping Kelly's name infused in scandals, even though he refused to give his testimony at the first trial. According to the narrative given by them, Derogatis received the alleged child porn in the mail by someone referred to as B.H. (Barry Hankerson)
The same person believed to be behind the whole Aaliyah scandal, was also behind the sex tape scandal. Hankerson was fired around the same time this sex tape surfaced and who in their right mind would continue to represent a person they felt married their underage niece? Anyone with clear vision can see the difference in a real marriage certificate and the provided certificate being said to be Aaliyah's.
Real:
It is commonly believe this alleged marriage was merely media deception to fuel the new artists career. According to reports, Hankerson had been trying to get Aaliyah signed for a while before using R Kelly as the driving force behind her. He signed her to his label and allowed Kelly to work his magic, which wasn't a problem until money became an issue. Ask yourself why is it almost every artist that ever worked with Hankerson had to either sue him for shady business practices or take a loss in their career.
Stephanie Edwards, a witness who identified her niece as being a victim is not credible either. She can't even be honest about the fact that she was married and had an affair with R Kelly, which is plenty of motivation for her to be scorned. She lied about how she originally saw the video, she even lied about being let go from R. Kelly's record label Rockland Records in 2000. The same time frame in which this sex tape surfaced.
How ironic that in 1998, Sparkle's video "Be Careful" included another witness named Damon Pryor, also known as Lisa Van Allen's baby daddy. This witness maintained R Kelly is not the man in the alleged sex tape, yet because Van Allen also proved to be an unreliable witness, his testimony wasn't needed.
The parents told us to hold lifetime accountable... how about we hold all of them accountable. They successfully tainted the court of public opinion, yet the final say will be held in the courts. You can manipulate the truth for the public.. its a crime to do so in the courtroom.
From the prosecutors to the attorneys.. numerous people need to be held accountable for the defamation of R Kelly's character without a conviction and for how his basic human rights have been denied over the last few decades.
What does it say about a case that is supposed to be a so called open and shut case when the prosecutor, Kim Foxx, is corrupt and should be investigated for malicious prosecution not only for Jessie Smollet but for every case she has ever launched.
Even though this case is sealed, it seems nearly impossible for a day to go by and these so called attorneys and alleged victims are disclosing information via social media. How could one expect to get a fair and unbiased jury??
What does it say when attorneys use press conferences as a marketing tool to further taint possible jurors and defame Kellys character before he has had his day in court?
It's very ironic that just like his first trial, Epstein was again facing similar charges and many of those involved in this public lynching of R Kelly, are affiliated with either Weinstein or Epstein. It's not uncommon to note that the FBI and police force are known to prosecute Patsies in order to allow deals to transpire for higher elites, such as Weinstein/Spacey/Epstein.
So the next time they try to use reverse psychology and say nobody cares about the black or brown girls, ask them what are they doing about all the missing brown girls, or those murdered with no one being held accountable such as Kenneka Jenkins or Jessica Reid..
Wake Up!!!!